|
|
Post by brucemacleod on Apr 7, 2007 15:16:41 GMT -5
Babcock said after the game that Hank was 100% for Game 1. He said they just didn't play him because they thought one game wouldn't make any difference.
I believe that Holland said the same thing on TV, so forgive me if I'm duplicating info from another thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by relient on Apr 7, 2007 15:17:45 GMT -5
i thought they said the he wasnt 100% but will still play in game 1
|
|
|
|
Post by funkybluefish203 on Apr 7, 2007 15:18:59 GMT -5
Kenny said Z will go in game 1 but health-wise he is not 100%
Welcome back, Z.
|
|
|
|
Post by brucemacleod on Apr 7, 2007 15:25:04 GMT -5
sorry. 100% will play in Game 1.
|
|
|
|
Post by ghostwing on Apr 7, 2007 15:29:35 GMT -5
He also said he might be close to 100% since it is almost a week away.
|
|
|
|
Post by wingedwheel on Apr 7, 2007 15:59:48 GMT -5
It didn't make sense for him to play either Thursdays or todays game. With Detroit starting on Thursday or Friday next week, that gives his back an extra week to heal.
|
|
|
|
Post by heyfolks on Apr 7, 2007 16:31:07 GMT -5
Not for my prediction but for the team, I wouldn't play Hank until the team was down a game and they won't be against the Flames. Kiprusoff is my biggest concern on this team, not physical play. Known for good ice and loud crowds, I like the idea of challenging the team with Hank on the sidelines for game 1 at the Joe.
|
|
|
|
Post by heaton on Apr 7, 2007 16:34:14 GMT -5
Not for my prediction but for the team, I wouldn't play Hank until the team was down a game and they won't be against the Flames. Kiprusoff is my biggest concern on this team, not physical play. Known for good ice and loud crowds, I like the idea of challenging the team with Hank on the sidelines for game 1 at the Joe. We need to win a playoff series, Hank needs to play. It's as simple as that. No one is going to be 100%. |
|
|
|
Post by norrisnick on Apr 7, 2007 16:38:07 GMT -5
Not for my prediction but for the team, I wouldn't play Hank until the team was down a game and they won't be against the Flames. Kiprusoff is my biggest concern on this team, not physical play. Known for good ice and loud crowds, I like the idea of challenging the team with Hank on the sidelines for game 1 at the Joe. I'd go the other way. Play him until we're up 2 games and then sit him. If they lose the next game, bring him back before it slips back to a tied series. |
|
MacavitY
Veteran
Whatever it takes
Posts: 785
|
Post by MacavitY on Apr 7, 2007 16:42:55 GMT -5
Lets play bootland, ellis, and langfeld on a line for at least one playoff game....or not..(sorry, random thought)
|
|
